I've laid enough groundwork at this point that it's time to start digging into the particulars of the Tontitown...
Measuring Additionality: A Step-by-Step Guide
I'm not done with the background material on additionality, but I do want to start to discuss how additionality is...
Why Additionality Matters
Yesterday I posed the question, "Why all the fuss about additionality?" Today I answer that question. Recall that you...
Additionality in Carbon Offset Projects | Sustainable Energy
As a starting point for our review of project additionality, it's worth stepping back for a second and posing a...
Tontitown: The Regulatory Test
The regulatory test is the big hurdle for Tontitown. Regulatory compulsion is a death knell for additionality. Although it is indisputably true that Waste Management was under no strict requirement to implement a methane flaring system, it is also true that WM used the ...
Review Process and Review Panel
With the addition of Dan Kammen, our review panel is now complete. Dr. Kammen is a professor in the Energy and Resources Group, Professor of Public Policy in the Goldman School of Public Policy and Professor of Nuclear Engineering in the Department of Nuclear Engineerin...
Tontitown: The Financial Test
One of the most intuitively appealing additionality tests is also among the most controversial with environmental policy types. The financial test asks whether the revenue from carbon offsets are enough to tip the budgetary scales so that a money-losing project becomes ...
Tontitown: The Timing Test
Perhaps the simplest additionality criterion is the timing test. The timing test asks whether the timing of the project is compatible with the notion that carbon offsets played a role in its development. So, for example, projects that are too old will fail a timing test...